Academic Exchange Quarterly Spring 2005 ISSN 1096-1453 Volume 9, Issue 1
To cite, use print source rather than this on-line version which may not reflect print copy format requirements or text lay-out and pagination. Join editorial staff
Closing the Digital Divide with Service-Learning
Sally R. Beisser, Ph.D. Drake University, IA
Stuart W. Shulman,
Teresa B. Larson, M.S.
Dr. Beisser is Associate Professor of Education with research interests in service-learning, pedagogy, and action research. She teaches doctoral courses in qualitative research and ethics as well as elementary social studies methods and pedagogy in teacher education.
Dr. Shulman is Assistant Professor in Environmental Science and
Policy who will be in Information Sciences and Public Administration and a
Senior Research Associate in the
teaches a service -learning laboratory course at
disparity exists in access to and use of computer technology among populations
who differ in socioeconomic status, educational background, gender, minority
status, and age (
Most notably, senior citizens over the age of sixty-five, representing the “gray gap,” are unlikely to use digital technology. Older persons were less supportive of technology, desired less public access to IT, and were less likely to participate in e-politics (Shelley et al., under review). Reservations include concerns about privacy, irrelevance, cost, and perceptions of the steep learning curve required to use computers and the Internet (Lenhart, 2000; Seiden, 2000). Seniors are often an economically vulnerable group lacking disposable income to purchase hardware and software. Digital inequality is further compounded as new technologies transform exponentially. Elderly persons, not growing up in the Information Age, are unable to draw on the existing skills and competencies required to learn new IT applications. However, given an opportunity to learn, senior citizens in this study came forward.
Development of a Service-Learning Computer Lab
Students in the Digital Citizenship course had a challenge to confront the digital divide. Students initially explored the impact of digital communication and citizenship. They learned that political parties interact online, interest groups use websites and e-mail, and government distributes information via the WWW. As a group, the elderly are not e-citizens, but when invited to come to free computer classes, they arrived eager to learn from college students in the service-learning lab. Students studied the ethics of volunteerism, different types of service, and the meaningful delivery of service-learning (Conrad & Hedin, 1991; Beisser, 2002).
Three research questions driving this study were: a) Do known building blocks for development of healthy, caring, responsible children (e.g., External and Internal Developmental Assets) manifest themselves in adult development of college students? b) As a result of a service-learning lab with a disenfranchised group, did participating university students reflect on social injustice? and c) In the context of a service-learning lab, what were unseen benefits of university students partnering with underserved populations?
All university students (N = 67) participating in the
service-learning lab completed an end of semester reflection paper sharing
multiple anecdotes and analytical examples to summarize experiences in the
computer lab, offer explanations for the digital divide, and provide evidence
of understanding principles of service-learning. After compiling two years of
students’ reflective journals across four classes, reflections were analyzed
with Atlas-ti qualitative software. Using the Search
Institute 40 Development Assets (1996) as a lens for evaluating the
reflections, researchers looked for twenty external and twenty internal
developmental assets of healthy, caring, and responsible young adults. The
framework of developmental assets offers a way of understanding the strengths
young people need in order to be productive members of society. .
In addition, we wanted
to measure the presence, or absence, of assets in young people's lives as they
continue in their postsecondary development. The developmental asset framework
and terminology, first introduced in 1990, surveyed over 350,000 sixth- through
twelfth-graders in over six hundred communities to learn about risks and
resiliency. Findings suggest that these assets encourage pro-social behaviors
and decrease risky activities (Lerner & Benson, 2003; Scales & Leffert, 1999). On one level, the forty developmental
assets represent everyday wisdom about positive developmental outcomes. On the
other hand, experiential learning through service provided a means of
engagement for young adults to reflect on these assets.
While unable to critically evaluate external assets of college students’ backgrounds (e.g., support and empowerment from family, neighborhood, school, or peers activities) that remained unexpressed in the students’ reflective papers, narratives were scanned for representation of internal assets (e.g., commitment to learning, positive values, social competencies, and positive identity) in response to their service activity. Almost 550 pages of electronic data were analyzed by multiple readers to categorize incidence of the following themes: commitment to learning, positive values, social competencies, and positive identity. Because the Digital Citizenship course fundamentally focused on the digital divide, responses for equality and social justice, appearing under the positive values asset category, were coded separately. For the five categories, a total of 517 quotations were coded. Results indicate that sixteen percent of responses reflected general positive values; nineteen percent social justice; twenty-nine percent social competencies; twenty-four percent commitment to learning, and twelve percent positive identity. In their papers, some respondents demonstrated an appreciation of multiple asset categories.
The internal asset categories were collapsed into three areas of importance, as expressed throughout student narratives.
Human interaction: Nearly two-thirds (fifty-nine percent) of student responses focused on the power of human interaction through commitment to learning, positive values, and issues of equality and social justice. They demonstrated a commitment to learning about people different from themselves. Student comments are represented by pseudonyms.
Commitment to learning. Students were committed to learning. One person helped her
senior citizen to learn to use email to “keep in touch with her
grandbabies." Another helped
her client understand the distinction between “.com and .net sites.” One senior
asked for help with Internet and Photoshop while others learned to use
spreadsheets and Microsoft Office©. Christy wrote, “When our session was
complete, we had begun to use search engines. I suggested we meet after class,
and I could continue lessons. Mary [the senior citizen] was ecstatic. I found
by writing procedures for her, she could more easily use computer functions.” Andi wrote, “The concept that there were millions of other
people online with the same first name [Edith] or last name [Smart] was
unbelievable.” Doug’s client went home happy with new information. “I made sure
she had my e-mail address in case she ever had more questions she wanted me to
answer.” Mike said, “
Positive values. Students exhibited positive values toward human interaction. It was clear that this wasn’t about teaching technology to a group of elderly people. This was about getting in touch and keeping in touch. One student said, “My client asked me about my hobbies.” Kathryn said, “We keep in contact. ‘I’ve e-mailed her, and she e-mails back.” Abby writes, “An important role I played was to build her self-esteem through encouragement.” Rebecca declares, “The great thing about e-mail is that if they have future troubles with computers, they are able to reach me to matter where my career takes me after graduation!” Jake says, “A very important part of the digital citizenship lab experience is relationships between student and client. It is crucial that students treat the senior citizens with the respect they deserve.” Jason sums it up, “I feel as though I have a better understanding of a whole new population of people within the community I already live in.” Vern states, “The bottom line is service learning is an amazing experience for anybody, and it's more than just teaching—it's improving lives.”
Social justice. Students better understood equality and social justice. Trisha begins, “We were to actively engage in the improvement of those disenfranchised--those most affected by the digital divide.” Tosha notes, “This was the first time that I had really reached out to the senior community. It seems like we’re always trying to improve the lives of our youth, but we never take the time to help the people who helped us.” Allie says, “This semester cemented my beliefs that senior citizens are, indeed, under-resourced in the area of information technology.” Amber helped her client with job skills. She states, “I was teaching her a skill that was keeping her from getting a job to better herself. I helped narrow the gap.” Christy hopes, “Wherever I end up after graduation, I hope to find a program similar to ours to assist people in becoming better citizens and bettering themselves while opening my horizons about groups I incorrectly stereotype.” Allie reveals a deeper understanding. “I see now more clearly that there is a digital divide. However I am not convinced everyone on the other side wants to cross over.”
New understanding of reciprocation: Nearly one-third (twenty-nine percent) of the responses expressed surprising social competencies based upon what students gained, not what they gave. Kathryn said, “We cared about many of the same things. I taught them computer and Internet skills in exchange for their life experiences and further training in communication and teaching.” One student said, “It was not only his first experience with a computer, it was my first experience tutoring. I was quite uncomfortable at first, not sure exactly what to say or do. I was overly conscious of our age difference and afraid of offending him. By the end, however, I worked up to a level of comfort.” Another student mused, “I learned a lot about the lives of people who are a couple of generations older than I. I learned about the history that these people experienced before I was even born!” Remarked Alex, “I doubted the importance of students' role in community building. I didn't think spending time with people in the community would promote social oneness. I was wrong.” Another student said, “I have formed relationships that I would have otherwise never sought. I was able to influence their lives in a small way just as they have influenced mine.” One student said, “Service-learning was not about just putting a smile across a face, but rather meeting someone from a different walk of life and actually growing together in the experience.” Amber says, “Ideally service learning is a two-way street, with both student and client gaining.” Vern reflects, “He even indirectly taught me how to be calm yet focused. I taught him about computers, and he taught me a better way to behave.” Says Rebecca, “Not only did students teach senior citizens, but the senior citizens were partners in showing us how the community needed a project like this.” Nicole shares, “These six people and their life stories have changed the way I think about technology, and they have changed me. One of the only things I was hoping to get out of this experience was patience. I got all that and more.” Tosha says it best, “The best thing that I got out of my sessions with MaryAnn [the client] was a friend.”
Significance of intrinsic motivation for volunteerism: More than one-tenth (twelve percent) of responses provided evidence of positive identity through comments such as future intentions to serve. Tosha sums up the collective voice by stating, “Ghandi said, ‘Be the change you want to see in this world.’ This experience was one of the most rewarding times in my life. I not only learned what service learning is, I made a difference in the world and grew as an individual.”
Our study supports the need for
student engagement in service associated with coursework and study in order to
continue development and self-recognition of internal assets that strengthen
healthy development of young adults. In addition, through specific service to
were not only committed to closing the digital divide through direct
instruction of needed skills,
they better understood complex issues influencing such gaps , when service took place
in combination with intellectual discourse.
Beisser, S.R. (1999). Constructivist environments inviting computer technology for problem
solving: new junctures for female
students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
Jacoby, B. (1996).
Service-learning in today’s higher education. In B. Jacoby (Ed.), Service-learning in higher education:
Concepts and practices (pp. 3-25).
Lenhart, A. (2000). Who’s not online. Retrieved on December 18, 2000, from http://18.104.22.168/reports/pdfs/ Pew_Those_Not_Online_ Report. Pdf
Lerner, R., & Benson, P. (Eds.) (2003). Developmental assets and asset-building
communities: Implications for research, policy, and practice.
Muhr, T. (1997). Atlas-ti short user’s
National Research Council. (1999). Being fluent with information technology.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (2000). Falling through the net: Toward digital inclusion . Retrieved on July 7, 2002, from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/digitaldivide/
Roblyer, M.D. (May 2000). Digital desperation: Reports on a growing technology and equity crisis. Learning and Leading with Technology, 27(8) 50-61.
Scales, P. & Lefffert, N. (1999). Developmental
assets: A synthesis of the scientific research on adolescent development.
Search Institute (1996). The updated profiles of student life: Attitudes and behaviors-40
development assets dataset. Retrieved on February 21, 2004 from http://www.search-institute.org/research/
Seiden, P. A. (2000, Summer). Bridging the digital divide. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 39(4) [accessed via “Infotrac” Expanded Academic Index Copyright © 2000, Gale].
Shelley, M. C., II, Thrane, L. E., Shulman, S. W. Generational differences in informational technology use and political involvement. Social Science Computer Review, Under review.
Shelley, M.C., Thrane, L., Shulman, S. Lang, E.,Beisser, S., Larson, T. &Mutiti, J. “Digital Citizenship: Parameters of the Digital Divide,” Social Science Computer Review, 22(2) forthcoming.
Shulman, S. W., Beisser, S. R.,
Larson, T. B., Shelley, M.C., II, & Thrane, L. (2003). Service-learning
and the digital divide. A paper prepared for delivery at the International
Conference on Civic Education Research, November 16-18, 2003,
Report. (2000). Surveying the digital
Wilhelm, A. G.
(2000). Democracy in the digital age:
Challenges to political life in cyberspace.
Wilson, K., Wallin, J., & Reiser, C. (2003). Social stratification and the digital divide. Social Science Computer Review, 2(2), 133-143.