Academic Exchange Quarterly Summer 2006 ISSN 1096-1453 Volume 10, Issue 2
To cite, use print source rather than this on-line version which may not reflect print copy format requirements or text lay-out and pagination.
Democracy in the Classroom?
Paul R. Carr,
Paul R. Carr, Ed.D., is an assistant professor in the Department of Educational Administration, Research and Foundations
Democracy is a highly desirable but contested concept in
education. However, little is known about how current and future educators
perceive, experience and relate to democracy, which could have a significant
impact on how students learn about, and become involved in, civic engagement
and democracy. This paper reports on a study of 129
Educational systems and governments have become increasingly
concerned with standards, accountability and high academic achievement, as
evidenced by the No Child Left Behind legislation (Essex, 2006), but it
is unclear how the concept, experience and reality of democracy is to be
interwoven into the educational experience (Westheimer
and Kahne, 2004). In the debate on the purpose of
education, some research has focused on the “decline of civic education and the
willingness of young people to assume active citizenship roles” (Corporation
for National and Community Service, 2005:1), or the disengagement from the
formal political and voting process (Patterson, 2003). If there is agreement
that democracy should somehow be cultivated and infused in education
(Alexander, 1999), the evidence on how educators should do so is not abundant (Westheimer and Kahne, 2004). This
study explores the perspectives, experiences and perceptions of current and
future educators, who are students at a university in
• What are the perspectives, experiences and perceptions of College of education students in relation to democracy, especially within the educational context?
What are the implications of how
• How do current and future educators understand and relate to social justice within the context of democracy?
Research Sample and Methodology
The university at which the study was undertaken is an open-enrollment,
state university in
In November and December, 2005, approximately 400
The data were analyzed through two distinct, but compatible, methods: 1) using quantitative software (SPSS), generating statistical analysis from responses provided using a 1 to 5 Likert scale; and 2) using a qualitative methodology to analyze and determine the strength, depth and meaning of responses, focusing on the students’ open-ended answers.
In writing up the analysis, the following formula is used to identify quotations: a number, which assists us in separating data, followed by a letter, identifying whether the student is at the undergraduate or graduate level, followed by another letter indicating gender, and ending with a number, which categorizes the age of the respondent (1 = <22, 2 = 22-25, 3 = 26-30, 4 = 31-40, and 5 = 41+). For instance, (27/U/F/1) would represent Respondent 27, who is an undergraduate, female, under 22 years of age. Comments provided by respondents are placed in quotations, and have not been altered from the original.
This section deals with student perceptions, experiences and
perspectives, or, more generally speaking, attitudes, toward: 1) democracy in
Attitudes Toward Democracy
When asked to define democracy, respondents most frequently referred to a form of government, often alluding to elections and voting. Many answers contained similar combinations of words about it being a “government by the people and for the people” (21/U/F/1), or a “government in which the people hold the power rather than government officials” (36/U/M/1). Voting seems to be the central focus for the majority of respondents, emphasizing that democracy is the “The ability to choose (vote) someone who has same ideas/beliefs” (10/G/F/3), or it is when “registered citizens have the ability to elect their officials or even run for office themselves” (10/G/F/3).
Using a Likert scale, with 1
representing the lowest level of agreement and 5 the highest level, a slim
majority of respondents felt that the
Although the vast majority of respondents felt that
elections were the cornerstone of democracy, many students also perceived a
number of problems with the electoral process as well as the outcomes. Many
references were made to the recent elections, decrying a sense of fairness, as
in “Sometimes like in 2004
election not all ballots were counted-especially in
Social justice was a particular area of focus for this study, especially in light of the perception and reality that democracy, for it to have currency, must strive to eradicate injustice (Portelli and Solomon, 2001). The vast majority feel that social justice is an important part of democracy but a small number of people were confused about the meaning of the term, indicating that “I don't know what social justice is” (59/U/F/1), or that “Justice is important. I'm not sure what social justice is though” (86/U/0/3).
When specifically asked about racism, respondents were polarized, with a slight majority arguing emphatically that racism conflicts with the notion and existence of democracy, and others, about one-fifth, questioning the relevance of racism in contemporary times. For some, racism is a reality because “I feel we will have a female president before a black one” (47/U/M/1), and, similarly, “why have we not had an ethnic president?” (71/U/F/2).
On the other side of the equation, a small minority of respondents argued strongly that the issue is not a racial one, that “An American citizen is an American citizen. Americans of all races should take advantage of our democracy” (19/U/F/1), “In the end, votes have no color” (126/U/F/1), and, as one respondent put it, “Why would racism be an issue in democracy nowadays?” (26/U/M/1).
Attitudes Toward Democracy and Education
When thinking about democracy and education, a large number of respondents, who were current or future teachers and school administrators, did not necessarily make a direct connection between the two. Part of the reason for this is perhaps the discomfort some respondents exhibited with “politics”, and the general concern with the transmission of values, which could lead to concerns of indoctrination and bias. Similarly, most respondents admitted to not having a truly democratic educational experience during their high school years. Of particular note is that most of the students viewed democracy in education as being uniquely or primarily associated with elections.
A number of reasons were provided to explain why respondents’ educational experiences were not considered democratic, including the curriculum, the lack of funding, minority issues, and, perhaps ironically given that these are student-teachers, because of the teacher, who some perceived to be a “dictator”. One prevalent comment postulated that “The students do not govern the classroom; the teacher is the dictator. The students do not vote for the teacher; the teacher is appointed” (18/U/M/1). Racial discrimination was highlighted by one student, who contributed that “There is no fairness in the classroom; with the teachers, they expect African-Americans to do poorly; they don’t challenge us in advanced courses” (13/G/F/5).
A significant minority of respondents did feel that the education system in which they were educated was democratic but these comments appear to be more nuanced and less forceful than the critical ones above. Respondents commented that “We were always informed of issues pertaining to the school including the pros and cons. We were encouraged to vote when we came of age” (10/G/F/3), “Teachers listen to the thoughts of students and would adjust the curriculum accordingly” (11/U/F/1), and, quite simply, because “I don’t have much reason to believe otherwise” (108/U/F/1).
When asked about whether their high school experience had an impact on their thinking about democracy, a small minority indicated in the affirmative whereas most of the respondents were less positive. In some cases, it was clear that this represented, for some students, the first time they were encouraged to think about issues critically. One student claimed that “My school was full of supportive and outspoken people that helped to acquaint me with politics” (1/U/F/1), and another emphasized that “I began thinking for myself in high school and realized for the first time that the things I agreed with were really my thoughts, not my parents” (19/U/F/1).
Many more respondents, however, echoed the sentiment that their high school had avoided the subject or even, more drastically, failed them in not preparing them to deal with such issues. This is represented by comments that bluntly stated “Hell no, went to a city school; football there had an impact on democracy for me” (68/U/M/2). Others noted that “I didn't fall into the crowd” (16/U/M/1), and, in a condemning way, that “Due to not receiving a good education I feel that my community, city & gov't let me down” (24/U/M/3).
As a middle-ground response to the question about a democratic experience in high school, a number of respondents highlighted that this consisted of a single class on government or politics. Students noted, in a positive way, that “I took an honors government course and the detailed look into our gov't captivated me” (18U/M/1), “My last class in high school was government and I think this was the most effective” (43/U/F/1), and, finally, “I had a horrible civics teacher and did not think much about democracy beyond that class. However I did have a fantastic teacher who taught us about social responsibility to communities, etc.. That did impact me” (71/U/F/2).
When asked about whether teachers should strive to inculcate a sense of democracy in students, the vast majority of respondents agreed strongly, stressing that “Teachers certainly can make a major impact on developing democratic values in students, but teachers also have the responsibility to teach other forms of gov't.” (2/G/M/5). Respondents also emphasized the need to model and promote engagement, with some indicating that “I will teach them (students) not to complain about the world, but to go out and try to change it!” (22/U/M/1).
A serious concern raised by a strong minority of respondents dealt with the fear of unduly influencing students. This is a complex and problematic area, with respondents commenting that “I believe that values are important to teach as long as the teacher does not try to indoctrinate the student” (3/G/M/4), and that “They should teach students their rights, but not instil this ‘sense of democracy’ to the point where the students are indoctrinated” (11/U/F/1).
In the same vein, a small minority opposed teaching about democracy altogether because of the fear of bias and the transmission of values, thus inferring, again, that politics should not be part of education. Respondents were quite clear here in saying “No, because when they try to do so their political views come out” (25/U/F/1), “Teachers are capable of this, but not everyone's opinion is correct” (26/U/M/1), and, finally, that “it shouldn't be their (teachers’) job to do it. The government should take care of it” (76/U/F/1).
Of significant note, some respondents felt that teaching about democracy was not a factor because of their discipline, with some openly stating that “That's not really my field so I don't think it is my responsibility” (41/U/F/1), and “Truthfully, I would be more concerned w/ (with) teaching standards” (5/G/M/4).
This research has provided some evidence that, for
Of central importance in this article, and flowing out of the above themes and analysis, is the connection between education and democracy, which is, according to large number of respondents, a nebulous one. Many participants question the foundation of such a linkage, and provided commentary that suggests that there is broad concern about teachers willingly or unwillingly indoctrinating, unduly influencing, or shaping the values of students. There appears to be a general rejection of the notion that politics should be part of education, which contradicts Guttman (1999) and Freire (1973), who view education, in and of itself, as being a highly political and politicized enterprise. Civic engagement is generally understood in narrow terms, concentrated within a specific class/course or associated with elections. The critical area of social justice (Portelli and Solomon, 2001), especially in relation to race and poverty, is not fully supported as an integral part of democracy, and even contested by a minority.
Democracy requires lived experience, social interaction, connecting problems and forces, and continually challenging the social conditions defining the formal scaffolding upholding democratic institutions (Dewey, 1958). This research suggests that current and future teachers need more training on how to develop and teach democratic notions, concepts, activities and materials. Hess (2004) has found that teachers can develop skills in promoting discussion on “controversial issues”. The sentiment that politics must be avoided should be addressed so that social justice issues can be discussed in an open and beneficial way throughout the curriculum, not centralized in the social studies or government class. Educational systems should also review how they are organized in order to encourage, cultivate and develop civic engagement, inside and outside of the classroom. This would require school boards and governments developing guidelines and standards for democracy in education in the same way that they are presented, and monitored, for academic areas.
Education systems need to be able to debate, and establish, the parameters for becoming engaged in, democracy in order for their students to be able to understand that it involves more than elections. Especially in contemporary times, the notion of being conversant with, and immersed in, a multicultural society requires diverse experiences throughout the curriculum as well as in extra-curricular and service-learning activities (Guttman, 1999). Kymlicka (1995) has written widely on the concept of multicultural citizenship, questioning narrow approaches that can further disenfranchise people from participating in society. Through a systematic review of what democracy means, combined with how schools can become engaged in “thick” democracy, students will enhance, not only their academic, but also their socio-cultural and political experience, thus enriching themselves and the society in which they reside.
Alexander, G. C. (1999) Schools as communities: purveyors of democratic values and
the cornerstones of a public philosophy, Systematic Practice and Action
Research, 12(2), 183-193.
Corporation for National and Community Service. (2005). Quick guide: Civics in K-12
education. Accessed on January 24, 2006 at www.servicelearning.com.
Dewey, J. (1958). Philosophy of education: Problems of men.
Adams and Co.
Essex, N. (2006) What every teacher should know about No
Child Left Behind.
Freire, P. (1973). Pedagogy of
Guttman, A. (1999). Democratic education.
Hess, D. (2004). Discussion in social studies: Is it worth the trouble?, Social Education,
Holm, G. and Farber, P. (2002). Teaching in the dark: The geopolitical knowledge and
global awareness of the next generation of American teachers, International
Studies in Sociology of Education, 12(2), 129-144.
Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural
Patterson, T. (2003) The vanishing voter: public involvement in an age of uncertainty
Portelli, J. and Solomon, P. (2001). The erosion of democracy in education: from critique
Westheimer, J. & Kahne, J. (2004) What kind of citizen?: the politics of educating
for democracy, American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237-269.